Friday, March 16, 2012
Rising Gas Prices
I have no problem with corporations earning good profits... I have no problem with exporting EXCESS refined products... excess meaning that such exports have zero negative impact on domestic prices... with the exception of national emergencies there would be NO exceptions to this rule
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
What Will Congress Do About the Deficit
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Reality Check on The Housing Crisis
Monday, September 20, 2010
The Argument for Cram Down
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Credit Scoring for Wall Street Investments
The recent Goldman Sachs revelations are to say the least troublesome. The position taken by the Wall Street Investment Banks that the trader’s duped, were sophisticated buyers that ought to have done their own due diligence, exposes an unacceptable arrogance. The sale of the Mortgage Backed Securities that brought the financial world to its knees was based on that very same premise… caveat emptor. You make your own investment decision, but we are going to hide and disguise the facts. Further, with each passing day, and revelation, it is becoming clearer that my charge of a vast conspiracy or at the very least misrepresentation by the Wall Street banks in cobbling together and passing off as investment grade, these fraudulent and extremely dangerous products; “guaranteed” by the equally bogus Credit Default Swap (CDS) A.I.G mortgage insurance policies.
In this mid-term election season, congress is going through its usual and customary charade of asking “tough” questions for the media and electorate, and then turning around and asking the
We need, and want our investment banks, and Wall Street brokerages to offer products that will generate income. Yes, these will always be risk based offerings. By their very nature this will be the case. However, in this computer age, but there MUST be openness, and without the subterfuge that has been the usual and customary business practice of the markets. Had the markets implemented the exact same underwriting criteria that are used in approving real estate loans, this entire economic meltdown probably could not have occurred?
Some 20 plus years ago Fair Isaac's created FICO risk/credit scoring. Each of us has a credit report derived from a scoring model and maintained by the three credit repositories. Borrower’s who have demonstrated strong credit worthiness are rewarded with the highest credit scores, and receive interest rate “bonuses.” EVERY mortgage originator hangs their hat on these scores; and then factor in loan to value as the deciding factor in approving each loan. History has proven that the default rate is directly related to higher the credit scores, and the lower the loan to value. The higher the score, the lower the loan to value, the lower the defaults rate. The converse is true, credit scores under 680 and loan to values exceeding 90%, yield a greater default rate.
A Mortgage Backed Security is, in effect a mutual fund comprised of real estate mortgage loans. The MBS must have an AAA or higher rating to qualify as investment grade sufficient to be offered to pension plans. Insofar as every loan placed in the pools already has credit scoring and a loan to value, the mathematical formula to arrive at a credit score for each MBS is quite simple to achieve.
Originators would be required to enter every credit score and loan to value for each loan into a data base… PRIOR to selling any loan into the secondary markets. Every new entry will result in a new score for the pool. Set a minimum “Investment FICO” score, say 800, to be a minimum for an AAA+ rating, 790 for AAA, 780 for AAA- and so on. Further, an MBS cannot be comprised of loans originated from any single source, further eliminating the chance for collusion. As an additional safeguard, originators MUST be required to either retain a position in every loan sold, or provide lender paid mortgage insurance in every loan sold into the markets. The originator made the loan,and must be required to retain a level of risk. Full transparency as to the quality of the loans in each pool would be guaranteed. This method would still allow a Wall Street bank to cobble together whatever garbage it chooses into lower grade loans into a below investment grade marketable security. No regulations for the Wall Street Banks, no looking over their shoulders, winking at a worthless, inept SEC.
My method would far more open… caveat emptor would still be the name of the game… however, the buyer, with proper advance “warning” would then be in the position to make an informed business decision. Congress has proven to be both incapable and unwilling to implement meaningful Wall Street regulation. The SEC has proven to be nothing more than a federal bureau designed to pay lip service to the public.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
And the bleeding goes on...
Sunday, August 30, 2009
GM invests $293 Million in China!
From Reuters: "...General Motors said on Sunday it has agreed to set up a light commercial vehicle production venture with major Chinese automaker FAW Group, with total investment of 2 billion yuan ($293 million)...." (http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57T0IV20090830)
Now, I'm not the brightest candle in in the candelabra... but didn't I read recently, that GM had filed for bankruptcy... that in order to survive it required 10's of billions of cash from "we the people"... that this cash infusion was intended to keep it alive... keep thousands of Americans employed... save the industry and revitalize our economy. Make no mistake about it, these comments are not intended as being anti-Chinese... it is a country of very intelligent hard working people. One that over the millennia has contributed much to the knowledge of mankind... it is not us against them... this is a statement of what "we the people" were told... this lead coffin of a debt was required to save OUR economy... it has become more than slightly obvious that we were, yet again, mislead (lied to?) by our elected representatives...
This agreement is yet more evidence that the Chinese are far better traders and bargainers than we… make no mistake about it, these international “deals” are reviewed by or involve numerous government agencies, not the least of which is The State Department…
I have no qualms with the concept of this joint venture... HOWEVER, it takes time and money to build plants; and time and money to hire and train new autoworkers... So please, would someone explain to me why this "joint venture"... is not using the several existing modern, shuttered, assembly plants ... hiring EXPERIENCED auto workers here in the
Hold it.. hold it… the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the cost of Mr., Obama’s nightmare health reform will cost “we the people” a mere$1.3 Trillion over 10 years… Would not this $293,000,000 be better spent providing health care for “we the people"
And so my fellow Americans... I believe that I will sit back, put my feet up, sip on a marvelous Napa Valley wine, and wait for one of you fans of Nancy, Harry and "B G & O" to provide any really good explanation this latest... sorry folks... fucking over of "We the people"...
For those of us who have any clue, and really care... the next national election is
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Home Builder Numbers or More Smoke and Mirrors
Sunday, March 22, 2009
The Greatest Generation
But only the abject gross negligence of Congress could have made it all possible…
Saturday, February 28, 2009
It's the Foreclosures Stupid... It's the Foreclosures
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Congress failed to require real, true, viable loan modification in the Housing & Economic Recovery Act as well as EESA and again in the ARRA. "We the People" have now spent or committed to spent some $2 Trillion, with trillions more to come, all without ever having addressed the root cause of this crisis.... the real estate defaults and foreclosures. In addition, proper loan modification WILL eliminate the vast majority of loan defaults that have brought about the massive increase in bankruptcy filings. Should our bankruptcy judges have the authority to modify real estate loans… most probably the answer is yes, however this is and ought to be a separate issue apart from the current economic crisis.
It has been stated that some 58% of loans that have been modified to date are back in default and foreclosure. A review of these loans will reveal that the cause for these failures has been the method of modification... the rate and terms applied in these instances have been a prescription for failure. Therefore, I suggest that congress require that any lender, brokerage, insurance company, or and any other firm that has received TARP or other federal funds, either directly or indirectly; and holds a beneficial interest in an any loan secured by 1-4 unit real estate, either directly or indirectly, be required to offer to modify all real estate loans with less than 3 years remaining to the next rate adjustment along the following lines:
WITHOUT the time consuming, meaningless process of (effectively) re-qualifying for a new loan, the existing loan balance is to be modified into a 50 year amortized loan, with a 5 year reset and an initial rate of 4%. The maximum rate change each 5 years would be +/- 2%; with a 9% lifetime cap. Loans already in default would carry a forbearance agreement added as part of the process.
This method of modification will reduce the loan payment by some 55%; while at the same time preserving the amount due to the lender. The aggregated annual savings of in excess of $150 Billion realized would, most likely, go into savings, pay down revolving debt or be spent fueling the economy through the purchase of goods and services (cars?). All of these options are positive and necessary for a cure to this crisis.
In most instances, this process would eliminate the urge to simply walk away from a property in which the homeowner has no equity. They require a home for their family; and what is better than the one that they already have. This proposal will stabilize not only the real estate and financial markets... but also the lives of these millions of Americans... while at the same time providing the knowledge and hope that, given time, they will regain the lost equity in their homes... the hope and positive attitude that my proposal brings to the table cannot be overlooked.
It is quite easy to verify that the number of families currently effected by this crisis is not, as reported 13 million, but more likely over 25 million real estate loans are in jeopardy... we cannot continue to ignore these people... as to stay on the present course, impacts every American family negatively.
Every time a homes sells as an REO or "Short Sale" the real estate tax base is reduced... the states and local governments are all reeling from these loses. This plan will put an end to this hemorrhage in tax revenue too.